SCREAM Underestimates Supercooled Cloud Liquid Water

Science

Cold air outbreaks (CAOs) happen when cold, dry air flows over warmer ocean areas, creating extensive boundary layer clouds. Marine CAOs and their associated planetary boundary layer and cloud fields present challenges for numerical models, including kilometer-scale models like the DOE global Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM). This is because the scales of shallow convection and related mixed-phase microphysical processes are much finer than the models' effective resolution. 

Impact

This study reveals that SCREAM global simulations at a 3 km resolution successfully captured three distinct cloud regimes in CAOs with realistic mesoscale structures but underestimated supercooled liquid water in mixed-phased cumulus clouds. These findings offer valuable guidance for future efforts to correct and improve biased model behaviors.

This study introduces a model evaluation method that selects observational references based on similar large-scale conditions. It utilizes the existing computationally expensive global simulations of SCREAM and available observations to evaluate model performance. This approach can also be applied to assessments of other cloud regimes in various regions.

Summary

This study examines the global storm-resolving model, SCREAMv0 in representing the transition of cloud morphology and cloud phase partitioning during MCAO events, using both satellite and ground-based observations from the North Atlantic during the ARM COMBLE field campaign. By selecting satellite and ARM observational references based on a combination of large-scale conditions rather than exact time-matched comparisons, this study finds that SCREAMv0 effectively captures the CAO cloud transition, including boundary layer growth, cloud mesoscale structure, and phase partitioning. SCREAMv0 accurately identifies the greatest ice and liquid in the mesoscale updrafts but underestimates supercooled liquid water in cumulus clouds.

The model evaluation approach used in this study leverages existing computationally expensive global simulations of GSRM and available high-resolution observations to assess model performance and can be widely applied to evaluations of other cloud regimes. This practice provides valuable guidance for future efforts to intensive sensitivity tests on mixed-phased cloud phase patitioning and their coupling with resolved scale motion and sub-grid scale turbulence.